By Kalen Olson
The days are winding down as Congress members exit office
and we usher in new political leaders.
Yes, it’s the lame-duck session. “Lame-duck” originally
referred to bankrupt businessmen in Britain who were considered “lame” because
their position rendered them as vulnerable as injured birds. Now, the term describes
Congress members who are on their way out of office. That’s why the lame-duck
session is an important time to make advances in policy. Senators and
Representatives aren’t up for reelection, so why not try and push policy they
may have been hesitant on before?
Oxfam America has a clear agenda this lame-duck session: no
more cuts to foreign aid. Voters lobbied on Capitol Hill, wrote letters to Congress,
and signed petitions to illustrate why foreign aid is important to thousands of
people around the country.
With just under 1% of the Federal budget going toward
foreign aid, it seems reasonable that Congress would approve this request. Not
only has foreign aid helped eradicate polio, but, according to Gregory Adams, Director
of Aid Effectiveness for Oxfam America, it has also fueled the Green Revolution
and rebuilt shattered economies. In the process, we’ve strengthened alliances with
Turkey, South Korea, and Poland.
![]() |
Perceived and Actual Foreign Aid Spending |
Further cuts to life-saving programs would represent a step
backwards, and mean the difference between life and death for many of the
world’s poor. Since it’s a small investment with a large return, Congress would
have to be quackers to cut aid.
Community members of New Mexico petitioned, wrote letters,
and visited Senators Bingaman and Udall. Co-organizer Jasmine McBeath and I
stopped by Senator Bingaman and Udall’s office with foreign aid info in hand.
In the midst of sequestration going into effect December 31,
Congress has to realize the long-term benefit of investing in foreign aid and
get moving this lame-duck session. Now we wait.
Get your last letter in before the end of December!
No comments:
Post a Comment